Contextual, Substantive, and Methodological Concerns in The Study of Politics, Comparative Area Studies, and Area Studies

Abstract

The subfield of comparative area studies within the broader field of area studies is not as well-known as other subfields. A comprehensive assessment of the continuing discussion about comparative area studies is provided by this work. Even though the research is mostly grounded in political science, many of its concepts are applicable to many other areas of study. It is critical to give greater credit to the area studies community for the advancements and scholarly discussions that have taken place after the Cold War ended. After that, we will explain what comparative area studies are and how we understand them, before moving on to examine several contemporary perspectives on the subject. Performing research on both individual regions and comparative ones is emphasized in a substantial portion. Two methodological challenges that frequently arise in comparative area studies are the use of concepts and the selection of research methodologies. The research delves deeply into both of those areas. The previously described issues are examined more thoroughly. An executive overview of the key points made during the investigation is included at the conclusion.

Keywords: Comparative Politics · Comparative Method · Comparative Area Studies Plan for Research